Accepting blogging responsibility
Spotted this at Jeff Ooi's blog today.
The female technology blogger -- (Kathy) Sierra is a programming instructor and game developer -- has come down under severe attacks for her views, and was inundated with hate mails and threats of sexual violence -- mostly from anonymous bloggers-commenters.While I didn't know who Kathy Sierra is prior to reading Jeff's entry, I can only imagine the emotional turmoil she has been going through.
The phrase "blogger responsibility" has become such a wild and frequent outcry ever since the phenomenon began its prominence in the MSM. When people begin to believe blogs more than MSM sources, I think society's structure of opinions will drastically change from both ends - the blogger and reader. I admit that being both a blogger and a blog commenter requires social responsibility. However, without accepting that there will be as many opinions as there are people in the world, I think that's where friction will begin between the two.
How do you draw the line between enforcing your views publicly and sharing them? What constitutes being responsible for what you're blogging or commenting? Is apologizing because you've offended a reader for stating your beliefs publicly being responsible? Maybe we should just be sorry that we have any opinion at all. Or that we live in a world where we experience life in our own way. Would you apologize for something you didn't imply, but your reader has perceived differently?
I believe that before blogs, before interactivity of the media and reader, the same scenarios would have happened in any era. The only "benefit", if you could call it so, to MSM is their detachment and professionalism. Blogs, depending on its category, can be personal writings. Sometimes even akin to books, I'd say. When an author writes a biography or fiction based on fact, isn't he writing based on his experiences or observations and sharing it publicly? Have they been accused for not correctly portraying events, facts? Of course. However today, the magnitude of it in the form of blogs would probably be ten times that. Don't quote me on this though, because I'm no expert. I'm just rationalizing the difference being that a book author doesn't need to deal with daily anonymous or pseudonym based comments, like blog writers do.
Maybe to show how responsible I am with my blog, I should just publicly say,
I'm sorry I have an opinion that's different to yours. Or, I'm sorry you didn't understand what I wrote.Fact is, I'm trying hard to eloquently explain myself and my thoughts in my entries, every time. They are personal thoughts, questions and ideas sometimes shared emotionally, thoughtfully or at random, albeit publicly. If I had meant something, I would have said it up front.
I've learnt and still am learning how my blog has become an extension of my life as I realize that those reading include my mother, father, brother, partner and very close friends. So to say that I'm not being responsible, while being aware that these people I love are sharing my thoughts and I am a reflection of who they are, I'll tell you - I respect your opinion, but I won't go out of my way to change it.

28-yr old nocturnal over@nal geekette Malaysian.
msg me


Comments
I was once told an interesting saying once. 'Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, no matter how wrong it is.'
I don't live by that, but occassionally I remind myself of that saying when I feel I've reached an impasse with someone over something.
The problem with most people, is they can't tell an opinion from a fact, and they often confuse their own opinions for facts.
That is where I beleive most problems between people come about.
[That, and when some people deliberately lie in order to cover up the truth ... but that's another kettle of fish]. :-)
Dabido (Teflon) | March 29, 2007 10:39 PM