Blogging as media
I'm enjoying the interaction I've garnered from some of you readers who've begun emailing me. One of them, with Edrei, has inspired me to post part of his questions as a Q&A about the mechanics of blogging here.
The following is my answer based on Marshal McLuhan's mechanics of traditional media gatekeepers (encoders) vs audience as information receivers (decoders) which I studied back in college that I found applies to the Internet, blogging in particular. Since I'd left so long ago, I should think that those doing Mass Communications now would be studying this.
Edrei's Q. I just need one clarification from what you said about gatekeepers and receivers of information. Wouldn't the interaction between readers and the gatekeepers differ from mainstream print and blogs, thus changing the way the mechanics is played out?
A. To answer your question - Yes, you're right. The mechanics of media in blogs have changed for the fact that it allows interaction, when traditional media never had that. Hence, it's very challenging at this moment for people crossing over from traditional media to new media to deal with interaction that's become interpersonal. For the media people, it is work and a part of their social responsibility. But for their audience, it's a part of their every day lives. So media people can't expect professionalism from their audience, can they? The least is for them to garner respect, and not insult their audience's intelligence while they provide information. Information in the relation to blogs can mean entertainment, facts, stories, etc. The same as traditional media, but from a less experienced or professional presentation. But the basic mechanics is the same - in that blogs are still providers of information, and audience are receivers.
The thing that most bloggers don't understand now is their responsibility and role as information gatekeepers requires them to garner their audience's respect and hold their interest if they want a consistent flow of visitors. I can't blame bloggers, because they think blogs are a fad. They don't see it as a medium, or media. Hence, some are fascinated and taken by the popularity they garner - just like in traditional media - and try whatever they can to maintain it. Or some don't, and the hype dies. There are so many parallels to traditional media, really. That's also why the internet is also called multimedia.
****
I might just share a little bit more about my own television writing experience here later to give an example of how I think blogging has a parallel to keeping an audience entertained.

28-yr old nocturnal over@nal geekette Malaysian.
msg me


Comments
i'm going to be an arse here and point out to you that edrei's name is spelt EDREI.
hahaha otherwise i liked the answer you provided to his question very, very much.
minishorts | October 31, 2006 11:18 AM
oopsies. i'm getting old. =P hee.. corrected. thanks!
midnite lily | October 31, 2006 11:28 AM
Heh...and I didn't want to correct you in the mail because it would seem overly anal for something so small. :)
Edrei | October 31, 2006 11:56 AM
'doh! u should have! i'm anal about my own name, so i understand perfectly! ^_^
midnite lily | October 31, 2006 1:25 PM
I'm anal about pretty much everything, so apologies in advance. But really, it's like you see a crime being committed, you have to do something right ? it's not really being anal (I'm just justifying this I know) but but, it's not being anal at all :) all my posts have perfect spelling and grammar (at least those I spot anyway.) Even this post, I'm editing and re-editing :) in the end it's nice to have someone who understands what being anal is all about. Is it my fault, I don't know. Being an arse is difficult job, but hey someone's got to do it :D
The other thing is that being too professional has it's drawbacks. You have a lot of constraints on the actual media, not only because you have to be professional about things. You have space constraints etc. So it's different from here where you have no word limits etc.
So there you go, yet another anal post. But it's not anal at all. Not at all. Honest. :)
Required | October 31, 2006 7:57 PM
i spotted a typo in one of ur comments n deleted the stray letter! =P
re: constraints in media - true, maybe that's why ppl are reading and embracing blogging for it's "unrefinedness", too. there's no right or wrong. its a different form of entertainment.
midnite lily | November 1, 2006 10:27 AM