28-yr old nocturnal over@nal geekette Malaysian.

Yahoo! me msg me



previous 7 entries

Who is the richer? Jun.15

Bad breaks Jun.14

Sweet Suite plugs Jun. 6

Dr who? Jun. 4

Ashamed Jun. 4

Writing Soul Jun. 2

Scrapblog Jun. 2







Malaysia Blogsites List


Latest Articles by Zona Marie Tan

« Malaysians, count our blessings | Main | Chasing Cars »

Ignorant call for retracting speech

With much discouragement over the world's Muslims furor about the Pope's speech, I looked it up to try and understand what he could've said that could cause such a grave uproar.

This is the excerpt of the Pope's speech (the full one can be found at the same link in PDF format) made at the University of Regensburg, entitled Faith, Reason and the University: Memories and Reflections.

In the seventh conversation...the emperor touches on the theme of the holy war. Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the "Book" and the "infidels", he addresses his interlocutor with a startling brusqueness on the central question about the relationship between religion and violence in general, saying: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

The emperor, after having expressed himself so forcefully, goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. "God," he says, "is not pleased by blood - and not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats."

IMHO, I believe that what he's said here has been grossly misinterpreted and taken wholly out of context by irrationally raged Muslims. And unfortunately, even our ignorant Malaysian leaders. I wonder if Pak Lah had actually seen the manuscript to the speech before demanding the Pope retract back his speech. He was probably advised to make that statement. I don't believe Pope Benedict XVI to be totally ignorant of what he was speaking. In context it was a speech addressing theology in a University. Had it been politically driven, don't you think it would have been in a different circumstance?

I am behind the Pope's apology. And I don't believe he needs to retract his speech at all. Yes, he may be the leader of the Church. But do you think quoting history in the context of that speech was enough to declare a potential religious war? God have mercy on those who call for blood in times like these.



Comments

i personally think that the Pope is just being a 'bigger' person and shown humility by apologizing.....and it doesnt cost anyone anything.....

to me its like saying.."I am sorry that some of you didnt see the big picture and the real message behind my speech....sorry of your ignorance and stupidity."

in a way, but i doubt he meant any malice in the first place. catholicism teaches us humility in any regard, hence his apology for offending people, and yet he never compromised by retracting. you respect a leader more for standing his ground and what he believes in is the truth.

In this day in age, there are still a large population of muslims who are extremely closed minded. *SIGH*

there are christians who are just as closed minded too, btw.

The Pope was making a point about faith having to come from within, that it cannot be forced upon one.

There are plenty of examples of forced conversion within Christianity's history. The Crusades. The forced conversion of aboriginals when the Conquistadors first arrived in the Americas. The residential schools that were established in North America to convert the "heathen indian" - where children were torn away from their families to be emotionally, psychologically, physically and sexually abused - all in the name of "converting" them to the ways of Christianity.

His Holiness was addressing a point that needs to be addressed and needs to be understood. However, he should never have used another religion as a scapegoat to illustrate an unsavoury practice in which all three of the major religions have engaged.

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

The Pope was making a point about faith having to come from within, that it cannot be forced upon one.
how right you are. the muslims here are forced to fast the way they enforce laws over Ramadhan here.

true, but he is also saying that history has proven all those things.

Leave a braincell